Archive for the ‘Leadership’ Category

Three Questions New Leaders Should Ask

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

Every new leader could benefit from the anatomical lesson of having two ears and one mouth. Listening is one of the most powerful skills that a leader can possess. In his classic work,  Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen Covey described the power in Habit #5 as “seek first to understand, then to be understood.”

Through the process of coaching many new leaders or leaders in new situations, I have developed a list of three questions that exploits the power of listening. When leaders find themselves in a new role or new organization, I suggest that they take the time to ask the following three questions:

  1. What are the three most important things that we do in this organization?
  2. What are the two most important things that we should be doing, but are not?
  3. Why are we not doing them?

I ask the leaders to talk to as many employees as possible, at all levels throughout the organization. I also request that they take notes of the responses, obviously and copiously. The power of this process is threefold:

  • It demonstrates that the new leader is interested in what their team thinks.
  • It provides an opportunity for the leader to gauge alignment through the organization about what matters most.
  • It reinforces that the leader will take a listen first posture and not presume to know what the organization is about (before they actually do).

So its as simple as that. Three questions, three big benefits.

Following this road map will enable a new leader to connect with their team, utilizing their two ears before engaging their one mouth.

Leader Development Demystified

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

It is quite straightforward, but a mystery to most organizations. The answer lies directly in front of us, yet we refuse to see it. I am not talking about the secret of life, the essence of the universe or some other deep, existential question, but to the comparatively mundane topic of leader development.

I suppose I should be grateful that this topic is more elusive than Sasquatch, seeing as it provides me and many thousand executive coaching compatriots with a raison d’etre. Still it is frustrating to witness the ongoing thrashing about that most organizations needlessly put themselves through on what should otherwise be natural to most firms.

The root of this problem, paradoxically, lies in its intended remedy.

When companies start out they are focused on one thing and one thing only, survival. Such focus provides crystal clarity on the actions that matter most to the firm and its employees, those activities that drive the attainment of results. Their every move is viewed through this lens. It is at once edifying and motivating. Every employee is required to embody this focus, for if they do not, the very survival of the firm is at risk. The fantastic derivative benefit of such focus is that it is highly developmental. By definition, the actions required for a start-up to survive require that employees take on skills in an untested crucible, where the likelihood of success and failure both loom. Studies of successful executives reinforce that such circumstances provide for the most meaningful leader development experiences.

Then, over time, something insidious begins to happen to the start-up. The firm becomes successful. With this success becomes the need to build infrastructure and sophisticated systems. Among these is a variety of management development tools which bring their own set of rules, competency languages, forms and requirements in order to “manage” leadership development. Over time, the very element that developed the firm’s leaders, a focus on results, gets lost in a sea of overwhelming administrivia, as the means (process) take precedence over the end (results). As a result, the remedy, at best, has a placebo effect. At worst, it is a shameful waste of resources…and focus.

My own research bears out the power of results-focused development. The number one strength of those executives that I have coached who later get promoted to the highest levels in their firm is results orientation. They know how to achieve results and focus upon them like a laser. No sophisticated system is required.

The implications are clear. To develop your leaders to their fullest capability, keep them focused on what has always mattered the most, results.

Leading Through The Viscera

Friday, November 4th, 2011

First off, I promise that this is not an anatomy lesson.

Rather, it is a discussion about leading. Or more precisely, a recommendation about how to lead in ways that genuinely connect with and move others to action. After all, the essence of leadership is to inspire people to take action; actions which they may not imagine themselves taking, but for the impetus from their leader. I contend that this inspiration rarely, if ever, makes its way through the frontal lobes of the recipient. The more common, direct and effective route is through the viscera of those being led.

Leadership is felt more than it is understood. The brain is a great organ to leverage in the dissemination of information, to teach, train and develop new capability. But for inspiration to be felt requires the participation of different organs, specifically the heart and gut. We process inspiration, not through our heads, but in the core of our being, literally.

In the cavity that contains our heart and gut we feel the impact of those moments that move us to take action…quickly and decisively. We language the visceral impetus in a variety of ways. The speech was “heartfelt.” Their reaction was “gut level.” But the test is always the same, you know it when you feel it in your gut.

The implication on leadership is clear. If you need to call your team to bold action, to inspire them to do what they would not otherwise do, they must feel it.  In their viscera. Too many leaders try to lead their people with facts, logic, charts and graphs, through the frontal lobes. Unless you are leading the debate team, it is time to shift your leadership focus from their heads to their guts.

Making Vs.Taking Decisions

Friday, July 29th, 2011

I have always found it curious how Europeans describe “making decisions” as “taking decisions.” For the longest time, I attributed this difference to nothing more than translational noise in the channel. But lately, I have come to appreciate a deeper meaning behind this difference, one with ramifications to anyone with leadership responsibility. (more…)

U.S. Women’s Soccer Personifies Teamwork

Monday, July 11th, 2011

I confess that I am not a huge soccer fan. I do not know all of the positions and do not understand the rules. Despite attending my kids’ games, I never really picked up on the nuances of the sport. I thought soccer involved a blob of kids kicking frantically at the ball, punctuated by orange slices afterwards.

Then I tuned into the Women’s World Cup. (more…)